• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ikki

Active Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
130
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Replace the sqrt(2) with 2 and its correct :)

The proper way to do it is just consider:



We know that it is purely imaginary for



Therefore it is purely imaginary for
Cool, quick check...






Let Reals=0




Gotcha :)

Thanks sy :)
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Mostly finished, I omitted most of seanieg's questions, I will compile them if I can solve them, if I cannot I will eventually make it a separate compilation for advanced problems.
I just need to sort it.


 

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

damn sy, I lost my answer do you auto logout.
imma just type my second answer which looks pretty wrong since i did it on word
ii) l1+Ml=2l1-Ml
 

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Mostly finished, I omitted most of seanieg's questions, I will compile them if I can solve them, if I cannot I will eventually make it a separate compilation for advanced problems.
I just need to sort it.


That includes poly?
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

I can help out with any you are stuck with that aren't too ridiculous.
Nice.


For the first rough version of the compilation, see the first post, I have edited it in there.


-------------


 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Cute little combinatorics problem:

A man is on the first floor of a building with n floors. He wants to use the elevator to stop at every floor exactly once. What are the minimum and maximum "lengths" of such a trip? How many trips of maximal length are there? You must justify all your answers carefully.

(Note: "Length"=number of floors traversed. Eg the trip 1->2->4->3 in a 4 storey building has length 1+2+1=4.)
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Just from a brief look, is the maximal length n(n-1)/2 and minimal length (n-1)?

Could be wrong, but that's what first came to mind.
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Just from a brief look, is the maximal length n(n-1)/2 and minimal length (n-1)?

Could be wrong, but that's what first came to mind.
Yep, the main part of the problem is in determining the number of maximal trips (with proof) though.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Cute little combinatorics problem:

A man is on the first floor of a building with n floors. He wants to use the elevator to stop at every floor exactly once. What are the minimum and maximum "lengths" of such a trip? How many trips of maximal length are there? You must justify all your answers carefully.

(Note: "Length"=number of floors traversed. Eg the trip 1->2->4->3 in a 4 storey building has length 1+2+1=4.)
Is it only 1?



Resulting in:

Now to prove that this is the only trip possible to yield maximal length:

Our initial moves are

This is the only way we can get a length of '(n-1)', if we make a different move first, say 1 -> 2, and then is NOT correct, since we already have been at 1.

Therefore the initial moves must be

The next move can be either to 2, 3, 4, .... , n-1

Likewise, we need to make a move of length (n-2) in order for the sum to work. The only way to do this is going to floor number 2, if we try to make the (n-1) length later on in the chain, we arrive at thet same scenario as the first. Therefore the next move must be:



Likewise, we proceed inductively, so that the only way to yield a move (n-3) in length, is to proceed from 2 -> n-1.

And so on, until we yeild a series of lengths:

We cannot permute the sum as proven above.

Now consider a general sum of moves to get to



There are n terms in the series because we need to make (n-1) moves to get to the other (n-1) floors.



The only series that can therefore add up to is



And since we have shown that we cannot permute this sum, therefore the only permutation allowed is:



Therefore we only have 1 trip of maximal length.

Likewise 1 trip of minimal length with a similar method, 1 + 1 + \dots + 1
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Is it only 1?



Resulting in:

Now to prove that this is the only trip possible to yield maximal length:

Our initial moves are

This is the only way we can get a length of '(n-1)', if we make a different move first, say 1 -> 2, and then is NOT correct, since we already have been at 1.

Therefore the initial moves must be

The next move can be either to 2, 3, 4, .... , n-1

Likewise, we need to make a move of length (n-2) in order for the sum to work. The only way to do this is going to floor number 2, if we try to make the (n-1) length later on in the chain, we arrive at thet same scenario as the first. Therefore the next move must be:



Likewise, we proceed inductively, so that the only way to yield a move (n-3) in length, is to proceed from 2 -> n-1.

And so on, until we yeild a series of lengths:

We cannot permute the sum as proven above.

Now consider a general sum of moves to get to



There are n terms in the series because we need to make (n-1) moves to get to the other (n-1) floors.



The only series that can therefore add up to is



And since we have shown that we cannot permute this sum, therefore the only permutation allowed is:



Therefore we only have 1 trip of maximal length.

Likewise 1 trip of minimal length with a similar method, 1 + 1 + \dots + 1
Not quite, the logic is flawed at the start: we do not NEED a step of length n-1 in order to be maximal. Examples are not too tricky to find (the first example exists when n=6), but I think it might give a bit too much away if I provide one. The point is we don't need to form a sum of the form 1+2+...+(n-1) in order to attain the maximal length.
 
Last edited:

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Let for denote the set of prime numbers, such that:







etc

Show that has no solution for
 
Last edited:

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Not quite, the logic is flawed at the start: we do not NEED a step of length n-1 in order to be maximal. Examples are not too tricky to find (the first example exists when n=6), but I think it might give a bit too much away if I provide one. The point is we don't need to form a sum of the form 1+2+...+(n-1) in order to attain the maximal length.
For n=6, 1->5->2->6->3->4
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Show that the minimum value of



is



Where is a positive real number for and it is known that for integer
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Let for denote the set of prime numbers, such that:







etc

Show that has no solution for
Essentially we must show that the sum cannot be prime.

We know firstly



Therefore,

Therefore,

Due to, (*), each is divisible by

Meaning, all is an integer, therefore:

for integer K

And since, , therefore does not satisfy the definition of a prime number, therefore there is no integral, k and n, such that
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Show that the minimum value of



is



Where is a positive real number for and it is known that for integer
Could you clarify what you mean by , there is no term in the sum beyond , so I was wondering if it were perhaps something like
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Let for denote the set of prime numbers, such that:







etc

Show that has no solution for
Each term in the LHS sum is even, and the first term is 2. But 2 is the only even prime! So this sum cannot be prime.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Show that the minimum value of



is



Where is a positive real number for and it is known that for integer
Letting, n=2, it should follow from this inequality:




EDIT: Actually it works my bad!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top