seremify007 said:
What amazed me was on the freeway, the acceleration from 80 to 110 was surprisingly good
Uhhh.. You're on your Ls, you're only allowed to go to 80?
ZOMGGGG Take me to test drives Jeff!!
seremify007 said:
Only problem with the Honda was the cost of accessories... as nice as the body kit may be, I'm not paying $2600 for it.
Ehehehehe but
you're not paying for it X] but yeah, it doesn't need a bodykit.. just weighs the bloody car down
Schoolies_2004 said:
a Honda loving friend of mine test drove the Civic and was alittle disappointed.... the newer ones look abit bigger and are only powered by a 1.8L engine.... seems alittle underdone?
Well you can't measure it's total capabilities by just how many ccs it is.. my old corolla was a 1.8L but only produced 88kw, whereas this 1.8L produces 103kw.. true in size difference, but I don't think it should be affected that much? Especially in the base model when it doesn't have much to be weighed down with..
seremify007 said:
On a sidenote, when testing the Civic today (as I said earlier), the 80+ acceleration was surprisingly good
Yeah, the Civic seems to be a car quite suited to normal highway driving (90-120km/hr speeds).. the revs aren't particularly high and it sustains itself well.. Whereas your Terios is uhhh, probably suited to metro areas where you speed up to 20 and have to stop X]
petar13 said:
For 30k, one can get themselves an E34 BMW M5.
Reliability issues and high maintenance costs, are a given. Naturally.
Dude, you're talking to someone who's still on his L plates here.. Even when he does get his Ps, he won't be able to drive one of those things (restrictions)