SoCal said:
Man, I am really feeling a lot of contempt toward this subject. Anyway, I can start to do some study for it now that I have done my other three exams. Do you know how the exam is going to be set out? I think I remember him saying that the exam will be split into two sections. The first was going to be on the content the first lecturer taught us and then the second was going to be on the content the second lecturer taught us. Is that right and if so do you know anything more
?
I don't know whether to read the chapter summaries as revision or read the lecture slides
.
I was going to ask you the same thing. For the exam, there are 2 parts. The first part are questions relating to James, while the other part are questions regarding Bruce's lecture topics. I'am going to send Bruce an email about his part of the exam, has to whether there would be 3 questions from lecture material and 3 questions from tutorial issues. For each part you choose 3 questions out of 6.
For revision, I'am reading the textbook, lecture notes and tutorial questions/answers. As I found that James class test was based on short answers relating to the lecture notes and the textbook. While Bruce was based on eassy's. Reading the chapters first will you a lot of information, follow that by reading the notes, it will help to develop the important points you should know to answer the exam questions.
By biggest tip, for Bruce's part of the exam, is to know your tutorial work, because I found those questions to be easier than the lecture based questions. Also the tutorial was focused on the real life example of the iPod, which I found interesting and easier to use develop an eassy around.
My final tip is to use real life case studies when answering Bruce's part of the exam, eg iPod and textbook examples. For James, you just need to know the basic idea of an concept, maybe throw in a example to make sure you show him, you totally understand the concept. But since Bruce marks you using case study's you might want to know a few regarding his material.