Azamakumar
bannèd
How the fuck is that an applicable analogy.Bainesy said:down in flames, god said to adam "go forth and multiply". why would you have sex and use contraception. its like putting on plastic gloves then washing your hands, bit weird
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
How the fuck is that an applicable analogy.Bainesy said:down in flames, god said to adam "go forth and multiply". why would you have sex and use contraception. its like putting on plastic gloves then washing your hands, bit weird
go and catch an S.T.I. please, be my guest.Bainesy said:down in flames, god said to adam "go forth and multiply". why would you have sex and use contraception. its like putting on plastic gloves then washing your hands, bit weird
Condoms are murder and sex is only for procreation, aren't you a real Christian?DownInFlames said:edit: where do I want it to go? straight into a condom, where it belongs.
god said go forth and multiply, and this person said they would only have protected sex, therefore not going forth and multiplying. fuck its not complicatedAzamakumar said:How the fuck is that an applicable analogy.
Fucking idiot.AAO89 said:The 19% failure rate is because some guys get too caught up in the moment or whatever, I dunno what the failure rate would be from just whatever's in precum... but I bet it's FUCKING low. If you're without a condom and you're both really rearing to go, I think it might be worth the risk as long as you know the guy isn't a stupid cunt.
Um what % of people have had unprotected sex and gotten pregnant just due to precum?boris said:Fucking idiot.
You're a fucking downer, both elements of the analogy served the same purpose (ie to maintain sterility), whereas according to you sex and contraception are contradictory.Bainesy said:god said go forth and multiply, and this person said they would only have protected sex, therefore not going forth and multiplying. fuck its not complicated
Studies on precum have shown it to contain extremely low levels of sperm; levels consistant with infertility but not low enough so that it's impossible to get pregnant.AAO89 said:Um what % of people have had unprotected sex and gotten pregnant just due to precum?
u don't have to have sex with tramps to get an S.T.I .... but what u do with your partners is none of my business.Bainesy said:kirsty, why would i get an std??? i dont go around and sleep with everyone i can every weekend. only with people that i have developed a relationship with. skeeting is ok, sleeping with strangers, now that is dumb.
god said go forth and multiply, and this person said they would only have protected sex, therefore not going forth and multiplying. fuck its not complicated
Exactly.. It's EXTREMELY low, chances are unless the guy prematurely ejaculates (a real risk if you don't know the guy) he's not going to get you pregnant. As for HIV, how many middle class, drug-free, white Australian men are carrying that? All I'm saying is that if you know the guy well enough to know he's got good control and one night you can't get a condom for whatever reason but you really feel like it, it might be worth it to do it.boris said:Studies on precum have shown it to contain extremely low levels of sperm; levels consistant with infertility but not low enough so that it's impossible to get pregnant.
Chances are low; the chance is still there. There are no real reliable statistics on pregnancy rates from precum, it's hard to prove.
If it helps you sleep at night though, HIV can still exist in precum.![]()
Is that something you're willing to gamble with?AAO89 said:Exactly.. It's EXTREMELY low, chances are unless the guy prematurely ejaculates (a real risk if you don't know the guy) he's not going to get you pregnant. As for HIV, how many middle class, drug-free, white australian men are carrying that?
Since when are middle class, drug free white men the only people who engage in skeeting?AAO89 said:Exactly.. It's EXTREMELY low, chances are unless the guy prematurely ejaculates (a real risk if you don't know the guy) he's not going to get you pregnant. As for HIV, how many middle class, drug-free, white Australian men are carrying that? All I'm saying is that if you know the guy well enough to know he's got good control and one night you can't get a condom for whatever reason but you really feel like it, it might be worth it to do it.
The statistic of those who die with it should give us a decent idea of how many have it though, right? The fact is that very few middle class, drug free, white australian men die with HIV. Obviously my advice is specific, but for the most part I think it's what's relevant to most people who will be reading these posts.boris said:Since when are middle class, drug free white men the only people who engage in skeeting?
Again you're asking for flawed and unreliable statistics. Obviously the prevalence is higher in homosexual men, the number of middle class men with HIV is unknown because some either don't know they have it, or know and haven't told people.
Middle class men engage in risky behaviour.
LOL, leave. i think you have a few things mixed up sonny boyAzamakumar said:You're a fucking downer, both elements of the analogy served the same purpose (ie to maintain sterility), whereas according to you sex and contraception are contradictory.
Just leave.
Okay, well you continue to have unprotected sex with middle classed, white, heterosexual men.AAO89 said:The statistic of those who die with it should give us a decent idea of how many have it though, right? The fact is that very few middle class, drug free, white australian men die with HIV. Obviously my advice is specific, but for the most part I think it's what's relevant to most people who will be reading these posts.