Homosexuality in Australia (3 Viewers)

[SnowFox]

Yes. Democracy remember? Gay person circulates their opinion. Everybody else can.

Your profile indicates that you're a male. No I will not engage in fucking kidding you. That would be thoroughly gay.

No I will not engage in fucking kidding you. That would be thoroughly gay.

Oh.

My.

Fucking.

God.


There is no words to describe the stupidity of you.

 

[SnowFox]

There are no words to describe your idiocy. Contruct proper sentences you fucktard.

Learn to spell and comprehend common English and internet etiquette you moron.

 

[Cazic]

You can't have your cake and eat it to dumbshit. If you want children then get married to a member of the opposite sex and procreate or at the very least procreate in the absence of marriage.

Why can't people have their cake and eat it too?

 

[Ethanescence]

You can't have your cake and eat it to dumbshit. If you want children then get married to a member of the opposite sex and procreate or at the very least procreate in the absence of marriage.

There are plenty of heterosexual couples who aren't able to procreate either due to various reasons. In modern society, it's regressive to believe that only people who are fertile and heterosexual should be afforded the opportunity to have children - when there are opportunities to have children artificially, or to adopt.

There are various valid birth technologies that would allow a homosexual couple the ability to have children - via surrogacy, or artificial insemination, etc.

 

[SnowFox]

Nah, a simple spelling mistake is fine. Your fucked up sentences demonstrates a more systemic problem.

There's the difference...

No, a more systemic problem is forcing others to believe a false entity and pushing your beliefs upon them.


Learn to tolerate another persons belief/sexuality/whatever or you will not get any where in life.

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

And everyone has to listen to yours?


Ah you fucking kidding me?

I was just thinking that!

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

Now why do you want children when you have voluntarily decided to pursue a lifestyle which disallows you the opportunity to bear children? You can't have your cake and eat it to.

Why do some heterosexuals have children when they are incapable of caring for them?

 

[Name_Taken]

No, a more systemic problem is forcing others to believe a false entity and pushing your beliefs upon them.

Learn to tolerate another persons belief/sexuality/whatever or you will not get any where in life.

Whether you are a believer or not, we have just as much right not to tolerate the perversion that is homosexuality in society (in addition to other sexual immoralities) as you have to support and encourage it.

If I was assaulting homosexuals on the street, I would be able to see your problem, as if homosexuals were to attack Church property, I would expect you to able to see the problem with that.

At the very most, you should see this as a "peaceful protest", and you libertarian nutcases should recognize and respect our right to do this.

 

[philphie]

Why do some heterosexuals have children when they are incapable of caring for them?

we're not all impotent

 

[Name_Taken]

Why do some heterosexuals have children when they are incapable of caring for them?

Just because you choose to live in a gay relationship doesn't mean that you (as in personally and individually) would not be able to care for children well, and probably much better than some heterosexual fathers (alcohol abuse, or w/e...).

However it is a child's right to be raised by both a mother and father. Gods plan for a family was one mother and one father (joined by marriage) raising their children in a loving unit.

Undoubtedly, some parents will divorce of leave the other, or pass away, leaving a child without one or both parents, but this is a tragedy and should be treated as such. The original family is able to survive with only one of the original parents (who later down the track may or may not choose to marry again). The solution to this problem is not to irresponsibly deny the children their right have parents of both sex by handing them out through adoption to homosexual couples.

 

[Cazic]

Whether you are a believer or not, we have just as much right not to tolerate the perversion that is homosexuality in society (in addition to other sexual immoralities) as you have to support and encourage it.

If I was assaulting homosexuals on the street, I would be able to see your problem, as if homosexuals were to attack Church property, I would expect you to able to see the problem with that.

At the very most, you should see this as a "peaceful protest", and you libertarian nutcases should recognize and respect our right to do this.

No, I do not respect you doing this, much less agree that you have the right to do so.

You've setup a spectacular false dichotomy. I do not support homosexuality, I am indifferent to it but willing to defend the right of people to partake in it, and I suspect that is what everyone else here means when they say they "support" it. The people who clicked support in this poll aren't out there trying to convince people that homosexuality is the right thing to do, they are defending it against the attacks made by cretins like yourself. Fuck off and stop vomiting out hate everywhere - indifference is the only sensible position.

Edit: Scratch that first sentence, I do think you have the right. The rest still holds.

 

[Name_Taken]

There are plenty of heterosexual couples who aren't able to procreate either due to various reasons. In modern society, it's regressive to believe that only people who are fertile and heterosexual should be afforded the opportunity to have children - when there are opportunities to have children artificially, or to adopt.

There are various valid birth technologies that would allow a homosexual couple the ability to have children - via surrogacy, or artificial insemination, etc.

There would be different ways for me to win this argument (providing better points and arguing my case better or by finding and killing everyone who is arguing against me, for example).

Just because the end in both cases is the same (in this case, me winning the argument, and in your point, the parents being left to care with a child) does not always morally justify the means.

We are arguing from a moral perspective. The only morally sound method to have children is through sexual intercourse (between a man and woman, obviously) within the context of marriage.

 

[Cazic]

We are arguing from a moral perspective. The only morally sound method to have children is through sexual intercourse (between a man and woman, obviously) within the context of marriage.

Mate, you're an absolute fucking retard. Humans have been around a lot longer than the concept of marriage, so what are we to conclude from that fact and your statement?

 

[Graney]

We are arguing from a moral perspective. The only morally sound method to have children is through sexual intercourse (between a man and woman, obviously) within the context of marriage.

That's a bit backwards don't you think?

I've known couples in a lifelong defacto relationship who raised a wonderful family.

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

However it is a child's right to be raised by both a mother and father. Gods plan for a family was one mother and one father (joined by marriage) raising their children in a loving unit.

Where did you get this from? CROC?

 

[philphie]

marriage is just a piece of paper, seriously in the most likely chances of consequences what would be worse/ getting dumped, or getting a divorce? bahaha

 

[Name_Taken]

No, I do not respect you doing this, much less agree that you have the right to do so.

You've setup a spectacular false dichotomy. I do not support homosexuality, I am indifferent to it but willing to defend the right of people to partake in it, and I suspect that is what everyone else here means when they say they "support" it. The people who clicked support in this poll aren't out there trying to convince people that homosexuality is the right thing to do, they are defending it against the attacks made by cretins like yourself. Fuck off and stop vomiting out hate everywhere - indifference is the only sensible position.

Edit: Scratch that first sentence, I do think you have the right. The rest still holds.

Your head is just something you use to put a hat on isn't it?

Our reasons against homosexuality are religious, and you obviously don't grasp even the faintest understanding of our faith, so I would put it to you that you wouldn't even be able to empathize us on why we oppose it.

I have never suggested the infringement of a persons right to choose who they have sex with (be it male or female). I have never suggested that homosexuality or, more importantly homosexual sex should be outlawed.

Discouraging an unhealthy perverted lifestyle is hardly discrimination. I don't believe homosexual people are any different from heterosexual people. To me, they are all the same, people, made by God in His image, and entrusted with the free will to govern their own actions.

Its tragic however that some people choose to reject Gods love and callously offend Him by choosing to engage in sexually perverted relationships which He has expressly forbade us (as in all people) from participating in. This does not make homosexual people any more evil than the rest of us however. We are all sinners.

It is the pride that the homosexual takes in his/her sin (homosexuals are not the only people to take pride in sin, but this debate is about homosexuality so I will refrain from mentioning additional examples) and their demand for their actions to be accepted and tolerated (even by those who have strong moral and religious objections to homosexuality) that we object to.

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

That's a bit backwards don't you think?

I've known couples in a lifelong defacto relationship who raised a wonderful family.

Well they're obviously gunna go to hell for not doing things god's way, right Name_taken?

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

marriage is just a piece of paper, seriously in the most likely chances of consequences what would be worse/ getting dumped, or getting a divorce? bahaha

well we'd like the option anyway!

 

[philphie]

please don't patronise each other