Again I am saying to you blackfriday, actually appealing. What makes you say, in light of world advancements and current evidence, that Murali does chuck? Sure he does have a weired action, but the fallice of making claims that he does chuck based solely upon his action is blatantly wrong, becauseit has been proven, that his action appears to the eye as a optical ilusion of himthrowing the ball.
Now I could disrepute al this and stay with my naked eye and say what you and dave are saying that murli chucks. Or, I can utilise the available technology to my advantage, to extend my sensory perception of the world, and realise what is just and fair. Murali does not chuck.
So again, why do you say/ beleive that murali chucks. I do not understand. Everyone laughs and says it is obvious. Is it? When they say this they aregoing against scientific evidence.
his is fact Blackfriday. This science is fact. It is not a hypothesis. It is a blatant fact. Also, that most bowlers bend their ar when bowling, is als a fact. In fact, were you watching Aus vs NZ (go the kiwis!!), when Lee was bowling. Now if that wasn't arm straightening...
Furthermore the rules do have to be revised. In light of biomechanical evidence suggesting that it is near impossible for a player to bowl with a straight arm to due to the forces acting, dictate that the old tradition of a straight arm (wherefore no arm bendageoccurs), is incorrect and cannot be used in the modern scene.
Now Black Friay, you are arguing how an umpire tests for the chuck arent you. Well simply they just have to note it down. Put it in with the match referee, and the bowler gets analysed on both video footage of the match and lab testing. If they are found to be throwing under the new existing laws, I think there is a two year probation period, wherefore if they get trialed again and results come positive, then they are to bear a match ban, spanning, if memory serves me correctly, for two years.
You again, like so many people, say that more arm bendage equates with more control, and better spin. How can you say this Is their any proof, any scientific, preferably mathematical data that supports his hypothesis. Or is it just your strike at logic.
Okay Black Friday yet again you are using the tough match scenario. Now i put forward to you. What about Glen Mcgrath/ Brettt Lee. He is facing a tough match scenario, bowling during the last few overs, and trying to generate extra pace and obtain wickets. Wil he not, according to your scenario, and extrapolating uon your "logic" driven hypothsis that more arm bendage equates to more control + more pace, chuck a ball down?
In a perfect world: Everybody chucks (assumed knowledge)
In a realistic world: Everybody chucks (data)
In a perfect world : Shane warne is fat
But perfect world = realistic world
Therefore in a realistic world : Shane Warne is fat
Dave, I hope I am behind you during that match, where I can blow an air horn at your ear everytime you make such absurd statements
